Amicus Brief by CDAM. In the amicus brief written by the American Psychological Association (APA), it stated two major arguments in support of the petitioners, Miller, seeking to remove LWOP in a majority of juvenile cases. Amicus Brief by SADO. filed. Instead, Miller requires that a sentencer make an individualized Il. This brief does not purport to convey the position of N.Y.U. ... Miller v. Alabama; Jackson v. … The association has filed amicus briefs to protect children in the juvenile justice system in several cases, including Miller and Montgomery, which held in 2016 that Miller applies retroactively. The Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari on November 7, 2011, and scheduled Miller’s case to be argued in tandem with Jackson v. [1] The high number of inmates incarcerated for juvenile crimes is partially due to the Tough on Crime Movement of… (Distributed) Feb 14 2012: Appendix of Alabama filed. A MANDATORY LIFE WITOUT PAROLE SENTENCE IS DISPROPORTIONATE WHEN APPLIED TO YOUNG ADULTS ... young people and filed influential amicus briefs in state and federal cases across the country. Amicus Brief by Taylor. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND When Miller v. Alabama reached the Supreme Court in 2012, more than 2,500 inmates across the United States were serving sentences of life without parole for offenses perpetrated while under the age of eighteen. Brief of respondent Alabama REPRINT filed. (Distributed) Feb 21 2012 Amicus Brief by Finley. Amicus curiae (friend of the court) briefs are approved by the Board of Trustees and present to the court the views of the American Psychiatric Association on matters of mental health, patient care, psychiatric practice, and other forensic issues. Following the finding by the Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, Miller’s application for rehearing was denied, as was Miller’s petition for certiorari to the Alabama Supreme Court. (Distributed) Feb 21 2012: Brief amicus curiae of National District Attorneys Association filed. Miller v. Alabama, 567 U.S. 460 (2012), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that mandatory sentences of life without the possibility of parole are unconstitutional for juvenile offenders. VIDED. School of Law. consent to amicus briefs in support of either party or neither party. (Distributed) Feb 21 2012: Brief amici curiae of Michigan, et al. MILLER V. ALABAMA ARE STILL DEVELOPING IN YOUNG ADULTS ..... 5 II. Amendment. The United States Supreme Court on June 25, 2012, issued an historic ruling in No counsel for a party authored this brief in whole or in part, and no person other than amicus or its counsel made a monetary contribution to the preparation or the submission of this brief. Amicus Brief by PAAM. SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT In Miller v. Alabama, 132 S. Ct. 2455 (2012), the United States Supreme Court held that the mandatory imposition of life without parole sentences on juvenile offenders is unconstitutional. Welner’s report takes particular issue with the American Psychological Association’s (APA) amicus curiae brief in the Miller v. Alabama Supreme Court case, which argued that adolescents are less mature and therefore less culpable than adults. The Defender Association of Philadelphia is a private, non-profit VIDED. Amicus Brief by JLC-ACLU. See Appendix for a list and brief description of all Amici.